![]() It’s almost as if you’re intentionally trying to create more isolation, more loneliness, less companionship - which, of course, is exactly what they’re doing. I can’t think of a better way to make sure that boys don’t become friends with each other than by having the Left sitting there and pointing to every example of male friendship in pop culture and saying, “Look, they must be gay! Why else would they be hanging out so much?” It’s like you’re intentionally trying to dissuade boys from becoming friends with each other. This has the effect of making male friendships seem even less desirable to the males themselves. And that’s why it’s important to emphasize the value of friendship- especially to boys-and to provide examples of it - even these innocent, childish kind of examples in children’s books.īut those examples are being systematically taken away as the Left insists that every male friendship has a homoerotic subtext. It’s even harder as they grow older and become men because as guys, we don’t typically like to do things like talk and share our feelings, and we can more easily become totally absorbed in our work, and our responsibilities, and our hobbies, you know, the things that we do, and we could become completely invested in that and leaving no time for friendships, and sometimes-oftentimes-no desire for them, which isn’t actually healthy, it’s not a good thing. You know, it’s naturally hard enough for boys to form deep and meaningful friendships with each other. Stories of male friendship especially do not escape. ![]() They cannot conceive of ANYTHING as existing apart from that! Even a children’s book about a frog and a toad gets sucked into this sex-obsessive whirlwind! EVERYTHING does! Nothing escapes! They look out at the world through this lens of compulsive sexual preoccupation. We are walking, talking sets of genitals wandering around and looking for other sets to bump into, according to them. We should understand that according to the Left, we are all sexual beings, and ONLY sexual beings - there is nothing else about us that matters. And of course, that position must be one of full acceptance of whatever LGBT activists believe and whatever they want to do. Everybody, and everything, and every book, and every show, and every story must take a position on the LGBT issue, the only issue they care about. ![]() LGBT activists cannot allow anything to be neutral. Okay, the author of the book came out as gay? So what? Well, are you suggesting that gay people are incapable of creating something that has nothing to do with being gay? HE might have been gay, but he story that he wrote down and illustrated was just about a frog and a toad who were friends. It’s what we should be able to expect of children’s entertainment. It was utterly NEUTRAL on the question of homosexuality - it didn’t render a verdict! It was not concerned with the issue! And that was okay - MORE than okay. No, we’re not saying that! It was just a story about a frog and a toad who were friends, and went on adventures. We aren’t asking that Frog and Toad be restored to its original purpose of promoting the conservative position on culture war issues. Look, nobody is arguing that Frog and Toad was originally conservative or right-wing, or that it was anti-gay, or that it promoted biblical marriage. The Left is gonna take it and summarize it as, “Far-right redditor goes on unhinged rant about Frog and Toad!” Acting like WE’RE the ones who have made it ideological and political, WE’RE the ones who have found some sort of messaging in it, when in fact, they’re TELLING US that they put the messaging in the show! THEY are the ones who won’t allow anything at all to remain outside of the culture war. And in fact, that’s what’s gonna happen to in reaction to this very post that you’re currently reading. Okay, so, a few things here: First of all, the conservatives, the Right, we’re always accused of turning everything into a culture war - but as usual, that accusation is nothing but projection from the Left.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |